@article{55,
  author = {Gerta Keller and Thierry Adatte and Gerald Baum and Zsolt Berner},
  title = {Reply to {\textquoteleft}Chicxulub impact predates K{\textendash}T boundary: New evidence from Brazos, Texas{\textquoteright} Comment by Schulte et al.},
  abstract = {<p>We appreciate this opportunity for further discussion of the Brazos, Texas, K{\textendash}T boundary sequences and their timing with respect to the Chicxulub impact. Keller et al. (2007) used a multidisciplinary approach to document the stratigraphy, paleontology, mineralogy and geochemistry of the newly drilled Mullinax-1 core and a new outcrop sequence. Based on this multi-proxy dataset very strong evidence was presented that reveals that the Chicxulub impact predates the K{\textendash}T mass extinction (Keller et al., 2007). Schulte et al. take issue with this approach and our findings largely because they believe that the Chicxulub impact caused the K{\textendash}T mass extinction and therefore the K{\textendash}T boundary must be placed at the impact spherule layer (Schulte et al., 2008-this volume; Schulte et al., 2006; Smit et al., 1996).We welcome this opportunity to clarify misunderstandings, misconceptions and misinterpretations of the K{\textendash}T record in Texas and elsewhere.\&nbsp; <a href="https://geoweb.princeton.edu/research/keller/pubs/Keller_et_al_2008_Brazo.pdf" target="_blank">PDF</a></p>
},
  year = {2008},
  journal = {Earth and Planetary Science Letters},
  volume = {269},
  pages = {621 - 629},
  month = {Jan-05-2008},
  issn = {0012821X},
  url = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0012821X08000150},
  doi = {10.1016/j.epsl.2007.12.025},
  language = {eng},
}